W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > August 2003

Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF?

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 18:38:00 -0700
Message-ID: <001501c36072$7a0a9d00$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>

Since nobody else has mentioned MKR, I will say that
it is also much nicer than XML.

    http://rhm.cdepot.net/

MKR is also a more powerful language -- it includes
context, questions and commands.

A recent addition to the MKE implementation is a
user-friendly interface to 

    Stanford TAP KB
    Google
    Amazon.com

I will be sending out some examples in the next few days.

My future plans include a user-friendly interface to OpenCyc.

Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF?


> 
> In article <006201c35ed3$aee72480$27bc0150@localhost>,
>  "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com> wrote:
> 
> > Notation3: 
> > http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer
> > http://infomesh.net/2002/notation3/
> 
> Thanks, this is much nicer than XML.
> 
> -- 
> Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 11 August 2003 21:38:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:52:01 GMT