W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: ANN: (Revised) OWL-Quick-Intro

From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:07:20 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030422160231.0308e180@127.0.0.1>
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

At 20:34 21/04/2003 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
>Something of an aside that I might announce properly when more polished,
>but which relates somewhat to your device-description use case, I spent
>some time today working with some UAProf / CC/PP device descriptions in RDF,
>working notes on which can be found at
>http://esw.w3.org/topic/UAProfIndex in the ESW wiki. I harvested device
>descriptions from http://w3development.de/rdf/uaprof_repository/ and loaded
>them into an RDF store, trying queries such as
>[[
>   SELECT ?model, ?vendor, ?size, ?doescolor, ?doesimages, ?doestextin, ?hwp,
>     WHERE
>       (prf::Model ?hwp ?model)
>       (prf::Vendor ?hwp ?vendor)
>       (prf::ScreenSize ?hwp ?size)
>       (prf::ColorCapable ?hwp ?doescolor)
>       (prf::ImageCapable ?hwp ?doesimages)
>       (prf::TextInputCapable ?hwp ?doestextin)
>    USING
>       prf for http://www.wapforum.org/profiles/UAPROF/ccppschema-20010430#
>]]
>
>...this is more for mobile phones than cameras, but I suspect
>http://www.w3.org/TR/di-princ/ and nearby might be of interest. After I
>built an aggregation of these descriptions the first thought I had was
>that with a bit more additional metadata they'd be quite good for
>building an online store, eg. 'find me something with such'n'so
>capabilities, color, screensize etc of type s:CameraPhone that works in
>the UK and costs less that 200ukp...

I'll note, in passing, that there's a big conceptual difference between 
matching a description (query) against a database of known cases (which as 
you have seen is pretty much a standard database query), and taking two 
descriptions and figuring if they match.

Maybe this is obvious to you.  But when I tried, long time ago, to figure 
doing content negotiation in Prolog, I couldn't understand why I wasn't 
getting the significant help from the Prolog language that I expected, 
until I realized this distinction, and that Prolog's underlying processing 
model is more like a database query.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 16:44:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT