W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: readable N-Triples for camera.owl

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:45:54 -0700
Message-ID: <004501c308ee$bd61fca0$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>, "www-rdf-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

Good point.
Is it "N3" if I put "#" in front of the names?
Does it match some other language defined by W3C?
============
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Beckett" <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
To: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
Cc: "Costello, Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>; "www-rdf-interest"
<www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 3:11 AM
Subject: Re: readable N-Triples for camera.owl


> >>>"Richard H. McCullough" said:
> > FYI
> >
> > Here's a readable N-Triples version derived from RDF Validator & MKE.
> > http://rhm.cdepot.net/knowledge/applications/SemanticWeb/OWL/cam.nt
>
> That is not N-Triples at all.  It doesn't use absolute URI references
> and uses SGML/XML/HTML style comments - also not in the language.
>
> The N-Triples test case format (that I edit) is precisely defined in:
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#ntriples
> and if you have problems checking it, try the N-Triples validator I
> wrote:
>   http://www.redland.opensource.ac.uk/ntriples/
>
> This test case format is still under development although there are
> no plans to change it at this date.
>
> Thanks
>
> Dave
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 12:46:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT