W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: rdf:li outside of rdf:Bag

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:43:18 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030422134221.03a03590@localhost>
To: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>, jimbobbs <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

At 11:46 22/04/2003 +0100, Dave Beckett wrote:

> >>>Jimmy Cerra said:
> >
> > What does it mean to have an rdf:li element placed as the child of an
> > element that isn't a collection element (rdf:Bag, rdf:Seq, rdf:Alt, or
> > others)?  For instance, consider the following document:
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> > <!DOCTYPE rdf:RDF [
> > <!ENTITY jfc  "jfc://example#">
> > <!ENTITY rdf  "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
> > ]>
> > <rdf:RDF xmlns:jfc="&jfc;" xmlns:rdf="&rdf;">
> >       <jfc:arc rdf:about="#L1">
> >               <jfc:arcrole rdf:resource="#L1role" />
> >               <rdf:li>
> >                       <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t0" />
> >               </rdf:li>
> >               <rdf:li>
> >                       <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t1" />
> >               </rdf:li>
> >               <rdf:li>
> >                       <jfc:Thing rdf:about="#t2" />
> >               </rdf:li>
> >       </jfc:arc>
> > </rdf:RDF>


This is fine.  There is no requirement that the subject of an rdfs:member 
property, i.e. rdf:_nnn for some nnn be a container.

Brian
Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2003 08:42:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT