W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis"

From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:12:08 -0700
Message-ID: <004501c304fc$2ff9de00$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>
To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>

Nice paper, but I disagree with your premise.
I think people should try to use the same physical expression.
I do agree that it is desirable to be able to use the Ontology
to reconcile different physical expressions.
Dick McCullough 
knowledge := man do identify od existent done; 
knowledge haspart proposition list; 
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 8:39 AM
Subject: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis"

> Hi Folks,
> I have written a white paper[1] titled:
>    "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis"
> This paper summarizes the discussion on using a logical model (i.e., an
> OWL Ontology) to enable many different physical expressions (i.e., many
> different forms of instance documents).
> Comments welcome.  /Roger
> [1] http://www.xfront.com/avoiding-syntactic-rigor-mortis.html
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 12:12:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:45 UTC