W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: (Updated) Camera Ontology

From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:52:31 -0400
Message-ID: <3E9EBFAF.2C93EB4C@mitre.org>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
CC: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>

"Richard H. McCullough" wrote:
> 
> Notice that I used lower case for the "lens" Property/Part.
> Your upper case "Lens" can be the Class that is the range of the "lens"
> Property/Part.
> Then, in my (your) example,
> "ccc" ("Hasselblad_500V") is the value of the Property/Part "lens",
> and "ccc" ("Hasselblad_500V") is an instance of the Class "Lens".

Thanks Richard.  So, then an instance will look like this:

<Camera>
    <lens>
        <Lens>
            ...
        </Lens>
    </lens>
    <body>
        <Body>
            ...
        </Body>
    </body>
</Camera>

So, a lens property contains a Lens class, and a body property contains
a Body class.  Is this good practice?  I like it, I just thought that is
might be confusing.  What's Best Practice?  /Roger
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 10:54:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT