Re: (Updated) Camera Ontology

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT


Correction: I should have declared Part to be a Class, not a Property.
    <Class  Part>  <subClassOf  ObjectProperty>  </Class>
============ 
Dick McCullough 
knowledge := man do identify od existent done; 
knowledge haspart proposition list; 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
To: "Rinke Hoekstra" <rinke@lri.jur.uva.nl>
Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>; <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: (Updated) Camera Ontology
> Rinke
> Nothing wrong with Roger's model.
> I think you're just distracted by Roger's choice of names, especially
> "optics".
> 
> Perhaps this formulation will be clearer (omitting xmlns qualifiers)
>     <Class  Camera />
>     <Property  Part>  <subClassOf  ObjectProperty>  </Property>
>     <Part  body />
>     <Part  lens />
> 
>     <Camera  aaa>
>         <body  bbb>
>         <lens  ccc>
>     </Camera>