Roger, > I thing that this is a really cool idea! It nicely shows that "optics > is a camera part". No, what it says is that optics is a part relation between a camera and its lens. Abstracting from this, it simply states that a lens is a part of a camera. However, even if it did say that, the statement that "optics is a camera part" is false in my world. Whereas camera is a physical entity (an object, or artifact), "optics" definately is not. What kind of part relation are we talking about here? Regards, Rinke Hoekstra --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.471 / Virus Database: 269 - Release Date: 10-4-2003Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 04:05:55 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT