W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

RE: A couple question, Equivalent for rdf:resource

From: Jimmy Cerra <jfcst24@stargate.pitt.edu>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:15:37 -0400
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Message-ID: <000201c2fe3d$ecb6ac50$0100a8c0@drsoong>

>>>Jeremy Carroll said:
>
> I am increasingly taken by an approach that specifies which grammar
rules
> are not used.
> 
> I have just implemented this in the jena2 RDF/XML-ABBREV writer, which
> permits the following rules to be switched off:
> 
>>>[snip]
> 
> Switching a rule off means that the output conforms with the revised
> syntax with that section deleted.

Wouldn't it be more valuable if the parser turned the sections, which
were formatted (in RDF/XML, not visual formatting) with rules switched
off, into an equivalent document where the sections are formatted
correctly?

--
James F. Cerra 
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 22:16:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT