W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2003

Re: URI for language identifiers

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2003 11:56:13 +0100
Message-ID: <3E8C134D.3000709@eircom.net>
CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

Miles Sabin wrote:

> Right. And it illustrates why we can't take the TAG's rumblings too 
> seriously here. On the one hand we have a chunk of the TAG supporting 
> denotation by authority, and on the other hand we have a TAG consensus 
> that deep-linking is OK, hence that denotation by authority is bunk. 
> This is emphatically _not_ a narrowly technical issue, and expecting a 
> useful, consistent and authoritative statement from a technical body is 
> foolish.


Agreed, but see: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Meaning, 
(a normative section). This is getting baked into specifications, so 
I do think this candidate has to be taken seriously, if only to be 
debunked.

Bill de hÓra
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2003 05:57:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:58 GMT