W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2002

Re: rdf:parseType="daml:collection"

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:20:43 +0200
To: Ashley Yakeley <ashley@semantic.org>
Cc: "RDF Interest Group" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF7F83DFA2.E01E35D4-ONC1256C2C.002782D7@agfa.be>

[...]

> So how many other parseTypes are there not specified in the RDF 
standard,
> and where can I find specifications for them?
>
> <http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-rdf-syntax-19990222/> sec. 6 says this:
>
>      "Other values of parseType are reserved for future
>      specification by RDF."
>
> ...which tends to suggest that nothing other than RDF standards will
> declare new parseTypes...

right, and clarification can be found at
http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/
http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/07/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-grammar-productions
and soon in
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
and there is indeed a rdf:parseType="Collection"

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 03:21:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:56 GMT