>> However, I question whether the use of DC-in-RDF [1] elements in a >> document which is not an RDF document can really be said to be a use >> of RDF per se, especially given that the element names are identical >> to those used in a 'pure' XML encoding of DC [2]. > >Out of interest what do people think of the fact that the same namespace >names are used in both RDF and non-RDF based DC? A good thing, I reckon. DC describes the concept of 'title' orthogonally to the way it's represented in plain XML, RDF, gent's toilet graffiti or whatever. The ns identifies the concept description set.Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 11:33:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:56 GMT