- From: Alexander Jerusalem <ajeru@vknn.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:56:59 +0000
- To: "Nikita Ogievetsky" <nogievet@cogx.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 19:26 25.11.2002 -0800, Nikita Ogievetsky wrote: >Alexander Jerusalem wrote: > > > Hmm, I think the problem with your solution is that the two statements do > > not have the same subject. Shouldn't it rather be something like: > > > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="12345678901234567890"> > > <rtm:shortname>W3C</rtm:shortname> > > <rtm:weburi>http://www.w3c.org"</rtm:weburi> > > </rdf:Description> > > > > I know that the rdf:about as above is not valid RDF, I just want to > > illustrate that the contents of the id should be completely meaningless. > > For RDF compliance it should probably be something along the lines of > > rdf:about="urn:12345678901234567890". > >Sure. May I just correct you that >"contents of the id MAY be completely meaningless". >I made it sound English to help convey my point. The problem is not that your IDs are english but that the IDs of your two statements are not the same. They are "w3c" and "w3cwebsite" respectively. I thought what you wanted to say was that the *same* thing was indicatedBy and constitutedBy "www.w3c.org" whereas what your statements assert now is that one thing (w3c) is indicatedBy "www.w3c.org" and some other thing "w3cwebsite" is constitutedBy "www.w3c.org". I presume now that this is what you wanted to say, isn't it?
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2002 11:56:06 UTC