At 12:27 PM -0500 2002-11-21, Frank Manola wrote: >Also, if you don't like "resource", you might get more bang for your >argument taking it to the authors of RFC 2396 (see, e.g., >http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2396.txt) or to uri@w3.org. This isn't >an RDF-specific usage, after all. What about URI references which include fragment identifiers? My reading of RFC 2396 is that <http://example.org/> and <http://example.org/#foo> refer to the same resource. -- Dave Menendez - zednenem@psualum.com - http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 22:01:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT