W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2002

Re: "Resource" (RDF vocabulary definitions)

From: David Menendez <zednenem@psualum.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 22:02:27 -0500
Message-Id: <a05111b14ba034b5b8150@[10.0.1.2]>
To: fmanola@mitre.org, Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>
Cc: RDF-Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

At 12:27 PM -0500 2002-11-21, Frank Manola wrote:
>Also, if you don't like "resource", you might get more bang for your
>argument taking it to the authors of RFC 2396 (see, e.g.,
>http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2396.txt) or to uri@w3.org.  This isn't
>an RDF-specific usage, after all.

What about URI references which include fragment identifiers? My 
reading of RFC 2396 is that <http://example.org/> and 
<http://example.org/#foo> refer to the same resource.
-- 
Dave Menendez - zednenem@psualum.com - http://www.eyrie.org/~zednenem/
Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 22:01:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT