W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Contexts (spinoff from copy and wrap rdf statements)

From: m batsis <mbatsis@netsmart.gr>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 00:24:14 +0200
To: Bob MacGregor <macgregor@ISI.EDU>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Message-Id: <200211220024.14496.mbatsis@netsmart.gr>

On Thursday 21 November 2002 21:19, Bob MacGregor wrote:
>  Finally, models/contexts should be first class entities, i.e., they should
> be resources. That way, you can make statements about all statements in a
> context.  That's where the space saving comes from -- if you have 500
> statements that all have the same last-modified timestamp and the same
> author, you can put them into a context that has a single timestamp
> statement and a single author statement.  With reification, you need 500
> timestamp statements and 500 author statements.

I was also thinking about this under the name of "state" of a resource, 
defined under a set of properties and a set of acceptable values for each 

I agree that it's natural to "index" resources that satisfy selected criteria 
under a class. 

However, I find the use of the word "context" unsuitable and confusing. Then 
again that's just me; my choice of "state" comes mainly from wanting to match 
properties of certain values when those change over time, usually 

Kindest regards,

Received on Thursday, 21 November 2002 16:49:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:43 UTC