- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 12:02:48 -0000
- To: "Ian Davis" <iand@internetalchemy.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > Aside from the practical considerations of generating resources for > all possible dates, are there any other reasons why one would favour > literals over resources? Will the proposals for data typing literals > cover date relationships? > The datatyping proposals are now in the latest round of working drafts, and suggest the use of XML Schema Datatypes. I believe that XML Schema Datatypes would allow either of the approaches that you outlined ... you would need to check the specs but I think there is both datatypes for dates and also for years and months ... Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 06:59:19 UTC