W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2002

RDF, RDFS and DAML+OIL benifits over XML

From: by way of <passis@dee.isep.ipp.pt>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:51:06 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

[freed from spam filter -rrs]

Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 04:42:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211060912530.13945-100000@douro.dee.isep.ipp.pt>
From: Pedro Assis in Oporto <passis@dee.isep.ipp.pt>
To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org


I've read several W3C and DAML docs about RDF, RDFS and DAML (DAML+OIL),
and their role in the Semantic Web project, but I'm still puzzel by the
answers given to the basic question: "why use RDF-based technology rather
than only XML-based?" If one use an OO modeling (expressive issue is
address here) to describe the knowledge related to the target domain,
translating the resulting schemata to XML, shouldn't the XML output
address the same functionality as a RDF-based solution? Is it a mater of
logic/inference capability?



passis@dee.isep.ipp.pt | Tel. +351 22 8340500 Ext. 1712 
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 10:51:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:43 UTC