>AFAIK, it's still the case that one can create RDF graphs for which >there is no XML-RDF representation; If so, that seems a pretty fatal >flaw in a syntax. It looks as though it's well on its way to being fixed : " - add an attribute rdf:node to the RDF/XML syntax. - modify the syntax to permit rdf:node in place of rdf:about. - such a use associates the value of the attribute as a file scoped identifier for the blank node ..." http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jul/0080.htmlReceived on Monday, 4 November 2002 12:21:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:56 GMT