W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2002

Re: bNodes wanted

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 17:24:48 -0400 (EDT)
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
cc: "Seaborne, Andy" <Andy_Seaborne@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0205231722380.14820-100000@tux.w3.org>
On Thu, 23 May 2002, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> On Thursday, May 23, 2002, at 07:36  AM, Seaborne, Andy wrote:
> > A precursor to better modelling is more bNodes - and a general
> > enthusiasm to
> > use them.  I think people shy away from them at present which hurts data
> > integration (amongst other things).
> Could you elaborate? I've always found bNodes a bad idea, since, among
> other things, you can't refer to them and so I strongly recommend
> against them.

A bNode is a sub-part of an RDF description. Wanting to refer to the bNode
(as against the thing it represents) is like wanting to refer to the " or
' characters around some XML attribute.

I thought this thread had been done to death. It seems not :(

Can't we talk about code and implementations and test suites instead?


Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 17:25:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:40 UTC