W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2002

RE: initial RDF Primer Working Draft

From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 13:35:10 +0200
Message-ID: <E657D8576967CF448D6AF22CB42DD26908BEA6@ermhs.Athens.BrokerSystems.gr>
To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, <fmanola@mitre.org>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Oops. These URIs are getting more restless every day :-)

[1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/RDF-XML.html

Manos

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Brickley [mailto:danbri@w3.org] 
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 1:32 PM
> To: Manos Batsis
> Subject: RE: initial RDF Primer Working Draft
> 
> 
> 
> [1] ?
> 
> (your URI reference dropped off...)
> 
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Manos Batsis wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > > From: Giles Hogben [mailto:giles.hogben@jrc.it]
> >
> > > Some comments from a fairly uninitiated person
> > >
> > > 1. One of the most important questions a newbie is often
> > > looking to have
> > > answered is "what is the difference between xml and rdf - xml
> > > can provide
> > > metadata information about content so what is new". Although
> > > the xml section
> > > essentially answers this, I think it should be addressed directly.
> >
> > Absolutelly... For example [1] worked fine as a primer for me.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Manos
> >
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 06:35:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT