On 2002-06-24 18:00, "ext Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org> wrote: Note that the approach I am proposing also would support arbitrary "colored" triples, not just a binary unasserted/asserted distinction: <rdf:Statement rdf:about="#foo"/> <xxx:bar rdf:resource="#bas"/> </rdf:Statement> <rdf:Description rdf:about="&xxx;bar"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#redPredicate"/> </rdf:Description> <rdf:Statement rdf:about="#foo"/> <yyy:bar rdf:resource="#bas"/> </rdf:Statement> <rdf:Description rdf:about="&yyy;bar"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#bluePredicate"/> </rdf:Description> <rdf:Statement rdf:about="#foo"/> <zzz:bar rdf:resource="#bas"/> </rdf:Statement> <rdf:Description rdf:about="&zzz;bar"> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#greenPredicate"/> </rdf:Description> etc. where a given application (e.g. via a "color" specific API) would interact with the knowledge base, seeing as asserted both the fundamental RDF asserted triples as well as the colored triples of interest. Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 50 483 9453 Senior Research Scientist Fax: +358 7180 35409 Nokia Research Center Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.comReceived on Tuesday, 25 June 2002 04:13:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:00 GMT