W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XMLNamesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:57:08 +0300
To: "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B92E7F64.16B20%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

On 2002-06-13 15:44, "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net> wrote:

> 
> [Patrick Stickler]
>   [Tom P]
>>> But what about embedding rdf into web pages so that it will not display?
>>> Don't we still want an attributes-only format for that?
>> 
>> Excellent point. Thanks Tom.
>> 
>> I've revised my proposed serialization so that string literals are encoded
>> as attributes on literal elements. This means that, with the exception
>> of XML literals, the serialization is completely an attributes-only
>> encoding, suitable for embedding anywhere with no worries about display.
>> There are no variant representations, so as long as there are no XML
>> literals, it is safely embeddable.
>> 
> 
> I like it, Patrick.  And with CSS, one can always display attributes if
> necessary (modulo NS4, of course).

Yup.

> The new form is more readable

Thanks. I thought so too.

Cheers,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2002 09:52:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:54 GMT