Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)

[Manos Batsis]
    [Tom P]
    >Just give up on non-CSS aware browsers, then?

Come on Tom, CSS is already compatible with lots more software than a
new tag will probably ever be. Besides, my point (answering to Frank
Manola's suggestion) was that, as things are today, we really don't need
a new tag; we have a wide variety of options bringing confusion already.

[Tom P]
It wasn't me who suggested a new tag, Manos.  I'm agin it.

I was thinking mainly of Netscape 4, which is still the officially supported
browser at my company and, I'm sure some others.

[Manos]
  2) You can also put your RDF somewhere in the head section of the
document; it will not be displayed by html aware browsers.

[Tom P]
Yes I know and it's probably what I'd do.

Cheers,

Tom P

Received on Thursday, 13 June 2002 08:40:32 UTC