W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Q to implementers: Resource identifiers - XML Namesand/or(concatenated) URIs? (was RE: rdfs.isDefinedBy...)

From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:37:57 -0400
To: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-id: <002201c212d7$25587d20$f6193044@tbp>

[Manos Batsis]
    [Tom P]
    >Just give up on non-CSS aware browsers, then?

Come on Tom, CSS is already compatible with lots more software than a
new tag will probably ever be. Besides, my point (answering to Frank
Manola's suggestion) was that, as things are today, we really don't need
a new tag; we have a wide variety of options bringing confusion already.

[Tom P]
It wasn't me who suggested a new tag, Manos.  I'm agin it.

I was thinking mainly of Netscape 4, which is still the officially supported
browser at my company and, I'm sure some others.

[Manos]
  2) You can also put your RDF somewhere in the head section of the
document; it will not be displayed by html aware browsers.

[Tom P]
Yes I know and it's probably what I'd do.

Cheers,

Tom P
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2002 08:40:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:54 GMT