It has been discussed in the past, and is considered a feature rather than a bug. Ron > -----Original Message----- > From: Alan Lillich [mailto:alillich@adobe.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:18 AM > To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: Multiple rdf:type elements > > > > An example of an rdf:Description element containing multiple rdf:type > elements came up in a recent discussion. Clearly the syntax > allows this, > and any one of the rdf:type elements could be used to produce > a typedNode > form. > > Has there ever been any discussion about the utility or > meaning of this? > Perhaps to model multiple inheritance? Is it an oversight in > the syntax? > Should RDF implementations complain about it if they have a > checking mode? > > Alan Lillich > Adobe Systems >Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 16:06:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:54 GMT