- From: Manos Batsis <m.batsis@bsnet.gr>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:17:32 +0300
- To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "Bill de hOra" <dehora@eircom.net>
- Cc: "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Bill de hOra [mailto:dehora@eircom.net] > > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Patrick > > Stickler > > So, sticking some RDF schema on a server under the namespace > > URL won't work anyway. > > No, it'll work, this is the web after all. It just won't be implied > by RDF. We can bang on about the semantics of XML namespaces with > respect to RDF, but people will go out and get things to work in > an ad-hoc case by case fashion a la RDDL. Since namespaces won't do, a question on (other) hacks and how effective they can be. I'm interested on 'per type' or 'per property' validation. Suppose I have an RDF schema accessible on-line, can I just use rdf:type from within instances of Objects to point to their validation module. No? Thanks for any pointers, Manos
Received on Thursday, 6 June 2002 06:17:58 UTC