Hi Sean, Excellent work, as all previous items coming from you. On [1], you claim that "DTDs are large and relatively complex" for use by HTML authors. I cannot say I agree, since I do not consider a WYSIWYG user as an HTML author; on the other hand, it shouldn't be difficult for an HTML author to learn some new tags to attach metadata to a document. Also, DTDs are not the only way to embed RDF XHTML while enabling validation. One can easily use XHTML m12n in XML Schema [2]. A convenient package of a modularized XSD for XHTML is at [3]. Extending xhtml:head to include RDF can't be that hard, although I really don't know how complete or stable the approaches at [4] are. [1] http://infomesh.net/2002/rdfinhtml/#embedAndValidate [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml-m12n-schema-20011219/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-xhtml-m12n-schema-20011219/xhtml-m12n-schem a.zip [4] http://ilrt.org/discovery/2001/09/rdf-xml-schema/ Kindest regards, Manos > -----Original Message----- > From: Sean B. Palmer [mailto:sean@mysterylights.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 5:15 AM > To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org > Subject: RDF in HTML: Approaches > > > > I've just published an article that outlines the various > approaches and > attempts to summarize a couple of years of discussions on > associating RDF > with HTML. > http://infomesh.net/2002/rdfinhtml/ RDF in HTML: Approaches Sean B. Palmer, 2002-06-02 I've sent it off to rdf-comments as input for the faq-html-compliance issue. It's also highly relevant to the current TAG discussions, so I will be sending an announcement there too, at the risk of over-cross-posting. Comments etc. are most welcome. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .Received on Monday, 3 June 2002 02:59:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:19:59 GMT