W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > February 2002

Re: rdf with xml schema

From: Andrei S. Lopatenko <andrei@derpi.tuwien.ac.at>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:33:36 +0100
Message-ID: <026201c1b49b$6c51b830$a6498280@tuwien.ac.at>
To: "David Greiff" <david.greiff@imk.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hello David
there is a lot discussions if it makes sense .. but

see simultaneous  use of xml schema and rdf in "application profiles"
to specify  semantic and syntaxis properties
J. Hunter, C. Lagoze, "Combining RDF and XML Schemas to Enhance
Interoperability Between Metadata Application Profiles" , WWW10, Hong Kong,
May 2001
http://archive.dstc.edu.au/RDU/staff/jane-hunter/www10/paper.html


some comparisons which might be useful to choose which languege to use for
what
http://trellis.semanticweb.org/expect/web/semanticweb/comparison.html
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/klein00relation.html
http://www.daml.org/language/features.html

best regards
Andrei Lopatenko

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Greiff" <david.greiff@imk.fraunhofer.de>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:33 PM
Subject: rdf with xml schema


hello rdf-world,

i'm searching for any articles or notes about the additional use of xml
schema while using rdf with xml basis in order to obtain more
syntactical constraints for the rdf-documents.
(does this make sense? from my point of view it might bring some
advantages for some less complex scenarios.
but the document structure enforced by xmls would also put constraints
on the order the statements have to appear etc. i think, that it will
also be rather fiddly and elaborate to construct a suitable xml schema
in addition to (respectively together with) an rdf schema.)
thanks for your comments!

regards,

david greiff

--
David Greiff, IMK.NetMedia
Fraunhofer Institut für Medienkommunikation
Schloß Birlinghoven B3-236 Tel.: +49/2241/14-1971
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 09:34:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT