- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 18:08:17 -0800
- To: "Joshua Allen" <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
There's just one issue here that I'd like to comment on. > ##### 3. I think my KR language is better than other knowledge representation > ##### systems. KR is easier for humans to read and write, AND it is suitable for > ##### machine processing. I think the Semantic Web community would benefit greatly by > ##### adopting my KR language as a standard. > > Considering that you seem to know very little about RDF and Semantic Web, it is surprising that you can be so certain that > your way is better. RDF and Semantic Web community are certainly spending time understanding "problems" and > developing solutions. Of course, that is not the same as someone shopping their "solution" around in search of "problems". > The reasons I'm so certain my language is better: (1) I've looked at other AI languages for 30 years; (2) in the last 6 years I haven't found any "problem" my language couldn't handle; (3) the core of my language is context-dependent definitions & hierarchies.
Received on Friday, 20 December 2002 21:08:22 UTC