W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > December 2002

RE: Issue/bug tracking terms in RDFS?

From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 15:52:23 +0100
To: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: "RDF-Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <don_raka@hotmail.com>
Message-ID: <EBEPLGMHCDOJJJPCFHEFOEHBIOAA.danny666@virgilio.it>

Thanks Graham, it's looking good.

I'm approaching this pretty much ad hoc too - I've got a big pile of bug
reports/issues and an RDF tool (Ideagraph) that should be able to manage
them, so I'm trying to join some dots.

I've not had chance to play with Mozilla/XUL/Bugzilla yet (I'm on Win2k, not
a good environment for Bugzilla!), so I don't know where that'll take me.

At the moment I'm not sure whether to aim towards using two or three
vocabularies : people (FOAF); projects (tasks); issues (issues/bugs). Before
the bug stuff came up I'd been bouncing RDFS ideas around for a generic
project schema with Cokorda Raka Angga Jananuraga. Bugs & issues are really
subclasses of generic tasks, but I'm not sure whether it would be better to
integrate them or keep them separate.

Anyhow, some early thoughts on specifics:

Issue being a high-level 'item' kind of class, with Bug and
EnhancementRequest (EnhReq?) being subclasses

Bugzilla's userid should be covered by using FOAF, as you have with
raisedBy, though internally I wonder if there's a good way of assigning URIs
to users for this. For me this might look something like:

btw, Bugzilla also has (effectively) ownedBy.

The DB schema for Bugzilla is pretty broad, but I reckon perhaps only a
handful of the fields/terms would be needed for a useable RDF schema. The
relevant links on the Bugzilla site were giving me 404s, so for ref I've
copied their schema diagram online at [1], also the relevant bit of their
'make table' script [2] (from checksetup.pl).

btw, earlier on I was contemplating using Bugzilla for the back end and
communicating with it using Ideagraph, which would need some RDB/RDF
mapping. After looking over the schema  a bit I now reckon it would be
easier, (and potentially a lot more useful) to stick to RDF at the backend
(Jena ModelDB?, perhaps using the NetAPI) with the possibility of using
Ideagraph at the front and/or a HTML form (from hell) like Bugzilla's.


[1] http://www.ideagraph.net/pedigree/2002-12/bugzilla/dbschema.jpg
[2] http://www.ideagraph.net/pedigree/2002-12/bugzilla/tables.txt

Danny Ayers

Semantic Web Log :

"The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne." - Chaucer

>-----Original Message-----
>From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
>[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Graham Klyne
>Sent: 19 December 2002 13:58
>To: Danny Ayers
>Cc: RDF-Interest
>Subject: Re: Issue/bug tracking terms in RDFS?
>At 10:06 PM 12/18/02 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote:
>>Has anyone put together a schema covering bugtracking terms?
>Er, I haven't done it particularly for public consumption, but I've been
>using an
>ad-hoc vocabulary for document issue recording for my RDFcore work.
>Sample files are at:
>   http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/DocIssues/RDFConceptIssues.n3
>   http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/DocIssues/RDFConceptIssues-group-lcc.n3
>(The latter is smaller)
>I also have some software that generates HTML from these files; see:
>   http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/DocIssues/RDFConceptIssues.html
>   http://www.ninebynine.org/wip/DocIssues/RDFConceptIssues-group-lcc.html
>for sample output.  The software is in:
>   http://www.ninebynine.org/Software/N3ReportGenerator.zip
>   (see file N3GenDocIssues.py)
>which is an application of my generic RDF/N3-driven report generator
>software, described at:
>   http://www.ninebynine.org/RDFNotes/RDFForLittleLanguages.htm
>At 10:06 PM 12/18/02 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote:
>>Has anyone put together a schema covering bugtracking terms?
>>The obvious model would be Bugzilla, but a search has proved fruitless. It
>>also came as surprise (once it had occurred to me) that RDF Issue Tracking
>>doesn't appear to use RDF...
>>There is the DB schema available for Bugzilla (in the download? the site
>>link [1] 404s at the moment), which I imagine would be relatively
>>straightforward (though time consuming!) to map across.
>>I think this stuff should yield pretty nicely to RDF modelling, and this
>>might even make for friendlier interfaces than Bugzilla's
>formicating thing.
>>[1] http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/html/dbschema.html
>>Danny Ayers
>>Semantic Web Log :
>>"The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne." - Chaucer
>Graham Klyne
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 10:04:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:43 UTC