I'm still not very fluent in RDFMT, so I'd appreciate your MT evaluation of the triple Resource Property Resource where Resource & Property are the RDF,RDFS Classes. For readability, I dropped the "rdf:", "rdfs:" qualifiers. I want to know because a. It's a simple way to specify the domain & range of properties, e.g. Resource Property Resource Resource comment Literal b. It permits you to associate properties with Classes (as opposed to Individuals). c. KR permits ("tabula rasa" proposition) Resource has Property = Resource ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done knowledge haspart proposition listReceived on Wednesday, 18 December 2002 13:34:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT