Hi, [ hope this doesn't get twice to the list; I found the dialog to publish a bit misleading: I wanted to grant permission for everything and then it tells me th message will *not* be distributed ] I'm working on a facelift of the SWI-Prolog RDF infrastructure. The parser now (almost, there are some dubious tests) conforms to the RDF revised syntax specs. Based on some practical experience how to use RDF I'm now redesigning the storage and query interfaces. In our projects we've seen the use of the sub-properties is a very neat way to relate information from multiple sources created with different viewpoints, so handling this information will now be a basic property of the query engine. How far however should it go? Can someone make a sub-property if rdf:type and claim that a new subject with this property belongs to the specified type? Given the fact that rdf:type is part of base RDF, where sub-properties are part of RDFS suggests this might not be a good idea. It might also seriously harm performance as adding/deleting such a subproperty relation can have huge consequences. Opinions? --- JanReceived on Friday, 6 December 2002 08:42:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:57 GMT