On 23 Aug 2002 at 15:48, Danny Ayers wrote: > So although there may be nothing amiss with n3 in itself, > might there not be a danger of it playing a negative role in > the adoption of RDF? I think the only negative is the lack of a comprehensive spec (altho Sean has taken us in the right direction). A non-XML syntax is easier to learn and use. Witness the popularity of RELAX NG's compact syntax. I'd love to see (or help develop) a spec for n3 similar to James Clark's RNC tutorial [1]. Does anything like this exist? Perhaps I've missed it. n3 continues to feel very much like a "hack". (Is that because it is?) JohnE [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/relax-ng/compact-20020607.htmlReceived on Friday, 23 August 2002 10:34:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 April 2007 18:20:01 GMT