W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > April 2002

RE: Disambiguation; keeping the "U" in "URI"

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 01:06:39 +0100
To: "'Danny Ayers'" <danny666@virgilio.it>, <msabin@interx.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000301c1ebed$135f6540$887ba8c0@mitchum>
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
 > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Danny
Ayers
 >
 > What is possible in practice is to use metadata to remove
 > ambiguity relating to assertions that use URIs, by reference 
 > to humanly agreed definitions which have unique labels, e.g.
 > 
 > http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/#Creator
 > 
 > This refers to "the name of the person or organization
 > primarily responsible for creating the intellectual content" 
 > of something, so if I state that
 > 
 > http://www.markbaker.ca/index.html dc:Creator
 > http://www.markbaker.ca/index.html
 > 
 > then it can inferred that one of these is a person or
 > organisation and the other something with intellectual 
 > content. No conflict.


Think of it another way. By Danny's reasoning, disambiguation is
property centric. We're doing disambugation because we can't be
sure URIs are used consistently. So we might as well have said:

http://www.markbaker.ca/index.html dc:Creator "Mark Baker"

ie, URIs don't get you very much as object values. Btw, this has
come up in the past, wrt to dc:creator referring to strings or
people as creators. I think some people still insist that
dc:creator says a string created the page in the example above.

Bill de hÓra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.4

iQA/AwUBPMdIjeaWiFwg2CH4EQL2CgCeNTWd8XfqgG7E60uBt0bF5gbLjW8AmgOP
lAwUqS+EfVi1IDCZR+bfiQX1
=W56+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 20:13:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT