> Here's another analogy. If I show you a photograph of the Eiffel > Tower and ask you "What's that?", then I think that either of these > two answers would be acceptable, > * It's the Eiffel Tower. > * It's a photograph of the Eiffel Tower. This example doesn't apply. A URI is an *identifier*, a much more appropriate comparison would be with "a word". More like, if you showed me a picture and asked "What's a 'tower'?". A URI's entire purpose in life is to identify something. I'll admit that ambiguity exists even in real-world *identifiers* -- for example, when I say "bad", I might mean "good". But considering that words are supposed to mean things, most people just use a default meaning, and crafty word usage requires disambiguation.Received on Monday, 22 April 2002 17:41:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT