- From: Miles Sabin <miles@mistral.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 20:33:20 +0100
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Joshua Allen wrote, > I agree with Uche on this one -- an http:// URI identifies a > document, and not a car. However, I can live with the other > proposals that people have put forward (Sean's technique of adding > an extra node works well). The most important thing to me, by far, > is just to have a decision and get rid of the uncertainty. I wish > someone would just declare that "this is how URI's for identity > work, and all other ways are discouraged." I like Seans technique too ... but, note that this doesn't eliminate the ambiguity in the reference of the _URI_. Rather, it sidesteps the problem by constructing a new referring term (URI+triples) which is unambiguous (or, at least, less ambiguous) than the bare URI. Cheers, Miles
Received on Monday, 8 April 2002 15:33:29 UTC