Re: silly question about rdf:about

On 2002-04-06 07:33 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> Why is rdf:about treated as magic syntax?  Wouldn't everything work the same
> in the grammar if http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#about were just
> another property?

While you're at it, please replace rdf:Description with rdfs:Resource so
that it uses the same typedNode construction as everything else.

-- 
[ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]

Received on Sunday, 7 April 2002 14:04:31 UTC