On 2002-04-06 07:33 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > Why is rdf:about treated as magic syntax? Wouldn't everything work the same > in the grammar if http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#about were just > another property? While you're at it, please replace rdf:Description with rdfs:Resource so that it uses the same typedNode construction as everything else. -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]Received on Sunday, 7 April 2002 14:04:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:53 GMT