W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2001

Re: Bitzi File Metadata RDF Dump

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:44:07 +0100
Message-ID: <018d01c146a2$3142eb40$a8d993c3@y0r1d9>
To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <aswartz@upclink.com>, <gojomo@bitzi.com>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> > http://bitzi.com/lookup/3KIZIJB64XP3NCXAE4ISQZT3Q
> > NCTF7VDNK5UNR8ZPQ5MFASNGVB5MISV7ESUS
> > B2MN5R3IY2
>
> I have to respectfully disagree with your recommendation here,
> Aaron.

And I am going to have to respectfully "kinda" disagree with you both. IMO,
I think that registering a MIME type for the bitprint may be a better idea
(and is very easy to do), and then one could use something like:-

data:text/prs.bitprint,3KIZIJB64XP3NCXAE4ISQZT3QNCTF7V
DNK5UNR8ZPQ5MFASNGVB5MISV7ESUSB2MN5R3IY2

Then again, I wouldn't have any particular objection to a new URN
namespace, especially an informal one. I do agree with Patrick that due to
the scope of the bitprints being in the interest of the Internet community
in general, it would be improper to use HTTP space to identify them.

Cheers,

--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2001 12:07:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:51 GMT