W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > October 2001

Re: RDFCore Update

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:11:59 -0400
Message-Id: <200110191511.f9JFBxL03268@wadimousa.hawke.org>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
cc: geoff@sover.net, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org

> Maybe there is yet a better way. Let's hear suggestions. Though I agree
> that qualified anonymous nodes is not the optimal way to do it (even
> despite low memory prices ;-)

But the difference only matters in the serialization module; the
internal representation would probably be the same either way.  No
difference in memory consumed.

    -- sandro
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 11:16:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:52 GMT