RE: RDFCore Update

> >      <rdf:type rdf:resource="xyz:string"/>
> 
> We're simply not in a position to change the spec to allow namespace
> qualified names in attribute values. That would fit better in a WG
> chartered to improve the RDF syntax, rather than bugfix it. So if
> 'xyz:string' is supposed to be using XML namespaces, no can do.
> 
> But don't let this put you off! Proposals for new, better, 
> faster sleeker
> RDF XML syntaxes are always welcome.

Ummmm.....  sorry, but that's a URI, not a qname.

I know it looks like a qname, but it's not ;-)

Its a URV scheme ;-)

No need to change the spec...

Cheers,

Patrick

--
Patrick Stickler                      Phone:  +358 3 356 0209
Senior Research Scientist             Mobile: +358 50 483 9453
Nokia Research Center                 Fax:    +358 7180 35409
Visiokatu 1, 33720 Tampere, Finland   Email:  patrick.stickler@nokia.com