- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:56:11 +0000
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
The RDFCore WG has been resolved some more issues on the issues list. http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-validating-embedded-rdf have both been postponed on the grounds that addressing them would require the WG to go beyond its current charter. http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraint-properties-resources Constraint properties and resources have been removed from RDF Schema because they didn't achieve their goals. http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-resource-semantics This issue requested a more precise definition of what a resource is and how it relates to other concepts such as URI and entity. The new model theory is a significant step forward and says enough about resources to provide a mathematical formalization of RDF. http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-logical-terminololgy This issue pointed out that some of RDF's terminology conflicted that used by logicians. The WG agreed that this problem was fixed by the approach taken in the model theory. regards Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 12 November 2001 12:00:14 UTC