W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > November 2001

RE: Trying to understand valid RDF [long]

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:00:28 +0200
Message-ID: <2BF0AD29BC31FE46B78877321144043114C054@trebe003.NOE.Nokia.com>
To: danbri@w3.org, Ian.Stuart@ed.ac.uk
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org

>         <my:field
> 	   my:name = "issn"
>            my:content="0001-3072" />

Dan, Ian,

This does, of course, result in a a subgraph
that perhaps is workable, but only to applications
which understand the 'my:content' semantics.

Such a treatment precludes the use of generic
tools which may be looking for either unqualified
literal property values, or qualified values 
where the value content is defined via the
generic rdf:value property.

Perhaps the following would be a bit more "generic":

  <my:field my:name="issn" rdf:value="0001-3072"/>

This provides the 'my:name' specific qualification while
keeping the actual content organized according to
generic RDF constructs and semantics, which might
be a bit more flexible over the long run.

Eh?

Cheers,

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 2 November 2001 05:00:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:52 GMT