W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2001

Re: Not-subClassOf

From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 19:30:35 +0100 (BST)
To: Fernanda Hembecker <fernanda@ppgia.pucpr.br>
cc: www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0105221921530.6475-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Fernanda Hembecker wrote:

> How could I say that a class X is not a subclass of class Y in RDF? This
> information must to be at my schema?

The RDF core specifications don't provide any mechanism to make such a
claim. However you can use schema vocabularies such as DAML+OIL (see
http://www.daml.org/) to make more precise descriptions of RDF
ontologies. Without looking I'm not sure quite what DAML+OIL offers you
in this particular case -- it has mechanisms like 'disjointWith'
that may be of some use.

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2001 14:32:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:36 UTC