- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 18:18:52 -0500
- To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net> wrote: > Now I would like a counter example demonstrating where making this change > breaks something that currently works. I'd be happy to -- it breaks my "says" namespaces. An example: <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:says="http://logicerror.com/rdf-says" > <rdf:Description rdf:ID="foo"> <says:Plainly>Your suggestion breaks my example.</says:Plainly> </rdf:Description> </rdf:RDF> Currently this produces the triple: <#foo> <http://logicerror.com/rdf-saysPlainly> "Your suggestion breaks my example." . after your suggestion it would be: <#foo> <http://logicerror.com/rdf-says#Plainly> "Your suggestion breaks my example." . By changing the resulting predicate, you have changed the entire meaning of my statement. The namespace is thoroughly documented at: http://logicerror.com/rdf-says -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2001 19:19:01 UTC