W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > May 2001

Re: N3 contexts vs RDF reification

From: Arnold deVos <adv@langdale.com.au>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 16:23:52 +1000
Message-ID: <004d01c0d399$a5d942f0$ea01a8c0@cockatoo>
To: "Seth Russell" <seth@robustai.net>, "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

From: "pat hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
> [...] For a
> second-order language you need a universe which has things and also
> has relations in it (not just defined on it, but actually contained
> in it.) [...]

I think the term "2nd order" is used in this sense in the RDF M&S spec.
Maybe the authors should comment on whether they meant to use the technical
meaning of "2nd order" or whether they were using the tern loosely.

- Arnold

Arnold deVos
Langdale Consultants
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 02:21:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:07:36 UTC