W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Attributes and Namespaces.

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:21:47 -0600
To: Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com>
CC: "Hart, Lewis" <lhart@grci.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B6E92DB9.7E2D%aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com> wrote:

> BTW1, this paragraph uses "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax" prefix instead
> of "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#". I believe this is an error
> and should be fixed.

Actually, I believe it's meant to be that way. I think the REC prefix was
put in to allow future extensibility while remaining backwards compatible
with the older spec.

> BTW2, has someone picked up the data type URIs from the formal XML Schema
> specification [2]? I would love to use them as 'range' values in RDF schemas
> and do data type validation for literal values in the data model.

Yes, DAML has just done this:

http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index

Although they do not use the formal URIs, AFAICT.
-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 19:22:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT