- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:21:47 -0600
- To: Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com>
- CC: "Hart, Lewis" <lhart@grci.com>, RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com> wrote: > BTW1, this paragraph uses "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax" prefix instead > of "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#". I believe this is an error > and should be fixed. Actually, I believe it's meant to be that way. I think the REC prefix was put in to allow future extensibility while remaining backwards compatible with the older spec. > BTW2, has someone picked up the data type URIs from the formal XML Schema > specification [2]? I would love to use them as 'range' values in RDF schemas > and do data type validation for literal values in the data model. Yes, DAML has just done this: http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index Although they do not use the formal URIs, AFAICT. -- [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Thursday, 29 March 2001 19:22:01 UTC