Re: Attributes and Namespaces.

Janne Saarela <janne.saarela@profium.com> wrote:

> BTW1, this paragraph uses "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax" prefix instead
> of "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#". I believe this is an error
> and should be fixed.

Actually, I believe it's meant to be that way. I think the REC prefix was
put in to allow future extensibility while remaining backwards compatible
with the older spec.

> BTW2, has someone picked up the data type URIs from the formal XML Schema
> specification [2]? I would love to use them as 'range' values in RDF schemas
> and do data type validation for literal values in the data model.

Yes, DAML has just done this:

http://www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index

Although they do not use the formal URIs, AFAICT.
-- 
[ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]