[PRISM] More comment dispositions

Another comment from Dan was:

>> * xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.0/basic/"
> I recommend "...basic#" rather than "...basic/", because 
> "...basic/" necessarily denotes an HTTP resource, i.e. a sort
> of generic document (i.e. a thing that responds to GET requests),
> but RDF properties and classes might turn out to be disjoint
> from HTTP resources. "...basic#foo" isn't
> constrained the way "...basic/foo" is.

For pragmatic reasons, specifically the concern over the
'download everything and dig through it' semantics of '#',
we will stick with the use of the '/' character.



Oh, this one was from Aaron:

> However, I do think it would be rather useful to get 
> something at those
> namespace URIs. RDDL will do just fine, and it has fragment 
> identifiers
> defined (both by XPointer and by HTML!).

Maybe later, but that is not required for the spec to work.
Concerns like that dominate my thinking since I have a lo
to do between now and April 9, when the 1.0 spec is released.

Ron