W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Spec doesn't talk about two-valued relationships

From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 00:22:42 -0600
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <B6D075D1.24BF2%aswartz@upclink.com>
Jan Grant wrote:
> Well, you could have an equivalent class to "everything" that was the
> disjoint superclass of "X" and "notX".

Yes, but DAML doesn't seem to have an everything class...

http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil.daml

There's Thing... would that work?

-- 
Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|       The Info Network
  <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |     <http://theinfo.org>
AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be
Received on Sunday, 11 March 2001 01:22:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT