- From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 00:22:42 -0600
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Jan Grant wrote: > Well, you could have an equivalent class to "everything" that was the > disjoint superclass of "X" and "notX". Yes, but DAML doesn't seem to have an everything class... http://www.daml.org/2000/12/daml+oil.daml There's Thing... would that work? -- Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>| The Info Network <http://www.aaronsw.com> | <http://theinfo.org> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237| the way you want the web to be
Received on Sunday, 11 March 2001 01:22:21 UTC