W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

Re: RDF Triples Transport

From: Seth Russell <seth@robustai.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 07:25:14 -0800
Message-ID: <006401c0a7e3$fa6f8040$b17ba8c0@c1457248a.sttls1.wa.home.com>
To: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@upclink.com>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Try http://swag.semanticweb.org/rdf2triples/  it's easier to vance.

Seth

language: Semenglish
vance definition "to dereference (or follow) a pointer like a URI".

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Swartz" <aswartz@upclink.com>
To: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: "RDF Interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: RDF Triples Transport


> Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> wrote:
>
> >>> How do you distinguish between quoted statements and asserted
statements?
> >>> E.g. Ralph says "Ora is creator of http://www.w3.org/Home/Lasilla"
> >> By using doubly reified triples. For an example, stick that RDF into my
> >> tripler, to see what it looks like (oh, and post the URL to the list).
> > OK.  So a "layer" of reification is implicitly applied to all
> > triples?  Seems odd, but I guess that works.
>
> Yup, look at:
>
> http://purl.org/swag/rdf2triples?url=http://purl.org/swag/rdf2triples
>
> I don't know why it seems odd -- isn't that how reification is supposed to
> work?
>
> --
> Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>|  SWAG: Semantic Web Agreement Group
>   <http://www.aaronsw.com>   |       <http://purl.org/swag/>
> AIM: JediOfPi | ICQ: 33158237|     helping build the next web
>
>
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2001 10:28:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT