- From: Eric Hellman <eric@openly.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 00:15:25 -0500
- To: lagoze@cs.cornell.edu, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
- Cc: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
At 4:21 PM -0500 3/4/01, lagoze@cs.cornell.edu wrote: > >I'm willing to acknowledge being think, but I'm still at a complete loss >to understand this use of rdfs:label. HOw is an "appropriate literal" >for a dc value at all related to the "human readable version of a >resource name" other than the fact that both are of type "string"? now you've got me worried about dc When something has a dc:property whose value is a complex object, what sort of "dc appropriate literal" would NOT be a label, or a "human readable version of a resource name"? We can be thiCk on RDF-interest , too. Eric Eric Hellman Openly Informatics, Inc. http://www.openly.com/ 21st Century Information Infrastructure Openly Jake- the library of the future http://jake.openly.com/
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 00:16:21 UTC