W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > March 2001

RE: Use/misuse of RDF:Value

From: Eric Hellman <eric@openly.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 00:15:25 -0500
Message-Id: <v0422080eb6cb711f3134@[65.2.141.254]>
To: lagoze@cs.cornell.edu, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Cc: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@upclink.com>
At 4:21 PM -0500 3/4/01, lagoze@cs.cornell.edu wrote:
>
>I'm willing to acknowledge being think, but I'm still at a complete loss
>to understand this use of rdfs:label.  HOw is an "appropriate literal"
>for a dc value at all related to the "human readable version of a
>resource name" other than the fact that both are of type "string"?

now you've got me worried about dc

When something has a dc:property whose value is a complex object, 
what sort of "dc appropriate literal" would NOT be a label, or a 
"human readable version of a resource name"?

We can be thiCk on  RDF-interest , too.

Eric

Eric Hellman
Openly Informatics, Inc.
http://www.openly.com/           21st Century Information Infrastructure
Openly Jake- the library of the future                http://jake.openly.com/
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2001 00:16:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:51:48 GMT