Re: Clarifying RDF #2: a Schematron schema

• From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:43:16 +0100 (BST)
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• cc: www-rdf-interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106201340090.17622-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

[snip]

Rick,

Many thanks for these, and also to Jonathan Borden for his recent
RELAXNG schema. I'll bring this work to the attention of the RDF Core
Working Group, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore

I would be interested to know whether there are any test cases we can
construct that pass only a subset of these various schema descriptions
of the RDF syntax... (eg. passes the RELAXNG schema but fails Schematron
or vice-versa).

cheers,

Dan

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2001 08:44:35 UTC